首页 考试吧论坛 Exam8视线 考试商城 网络课程 模拟考试 考友录 实用文档 求职招聘 论文下载
2011中考 | 2011高考 | 2012考研 | 考研培训 | 在职研 | 自学考试 | 成人高考 | 法律硕士 | MBA考试
MPA考试 | 中科院
四六级 | 职称英语 | 商务英语 | 公共英语 | 托福 | 雅思 | 专四专八 | 口译笔译 | 博思 | GRE GMAT
新概念英语 | 成人英语三级 | 申硕英语 | 攻硕英语 | 职称日语 | 日语学习 | 法语 | 德语 | 韩语
计算机等级考试 | 软件水平考试 | 职称计算机 | 微软认证 | 思科认证 | Oracle认证 | Linux认证
华为认证 | Java认证
公务员 | 报关员 | 银行从业资格 | 证券从业资格 | 期货从业资格 | 司法考试 | 法律顾问 | 导游资格
报检员 | 教师资格 | 社会工作者 | 外销员 | 国际商务师 | 跟单员 | 单证员 | 物流师 | 价格鉴证师
人力资源 | 管理咨询师考试 | 秘书资格 | 心理咨询师考试 | 出版专业资格 | 广告师职业水平
驾驶员 | 网络编辑
卫生资格 | 执业医师 | 执业药师 | 执业护士
会计从业资格考试会计证) | 经济师 | 会计职称 | 注册会计师 | 审计师 | 注册税务师
注册资产评估师 | 高级会计师 | ACCA | 统计师 | 精算师 | 理财规划师 | 国际内审师
一级建造师 | 二级建造师 | 造价工程师 | 造价员 | 咨询工程师 | 监理工程师 | 安全工程师
质量工程师 | 物业管理师 | 招标师 | 结构工程师 | 建筑师 | 房地产估价师 | 土地估价师 | 岩土师
设备监理师 | 房地产经纪人 | 投资项目管理师 | 土地登记代理人 | 环境影响评价师 | 环保工程师
城市规划师 | 公路监理师 | 公路造价师 | 安全评价师 | 电气工程师 | 注册测绘师 | 注册计量师
缤纷校园 | 实用文档 | 英语学习 | 作文大全 | 求职招聘 | 论文下载 | 访谈 | 游戏
考研_考试吧考研_首发2011考研成绩查询
考研网校 模拟考场 考研资讯 复习指导 历年真题 模拟试题 经验 考研查分 考研复试 考研调剂 论坛 短信提醒
考研英语| 资料 真题 模拟题  考研政治| 资料 真题 模拟题  考研数学| 资料 真题 模拟题  专业课| 资料 真题 模拟题  在职研究生
您现在的位置: 考试吧(Exam8.com) > 考研 > 考研复习指导 > 考研英语复习指导 > 考研阅读 > 正文

考研英语阅读理解命题思路透析和真题揭秘(42)

来源:新东方 2008-11-26 11:40:51 考试吧:中国教育培训第一门户 模拟考场

2002Text 4

  The Supreme Court's decisions on physician-assisted suicide carry important implications for how medicine seeks to relieve dying patients of pain and suffering.

  Although it ruled that there is no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide, the Court in effect supported the medical principle of "double effect," a centuries-old moral principle holding that an action having two effects-a good one that is intended and a harmful one that is foreseen-is permissible if the actor intends only the good effect.

  Doctors have used that principle in recent years to justify using high doses of morphine to control terminally ill patients' pain, even though increasing dosages will eventually kill the patient.

  Nancy Dubler, director of Montefiore Medical Center, contends that the principle will shield doctors who "until now have very, very strongly insisted that they could not give patients sufficient mediation to control their pain if that might hasten death."

  George Annas, chair of the health law department at Boston University, maintains that, as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, the doctor has done nothing illegal even if the patient uses the drug to hasten death. "It's like surgery," he says. "We don't call those deaths homicides because the doctors didn't intend to kill their patients, although they risked their death. If you're a physician, you can risk your patient's suicide as long as you don't intend their suicide."

  On another level, many in the medical community acknowledge that the assisted-suicide debate has been fueled in part by the despair of patients for whom modern medicine has prolonged the physical agony of dying.

  Just three weeks before the Court's ruling on physician-assisted suicide, the National Academy of Science (NAS) released a two-volume report, Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. It identifies the undertreatment of pain and the aggressive use of "ineffectual and forced medical procedures that may prolong and even dishonor the period of dying" as the twin problems of end-of-life care.

  The profession is taking steps to require young doctors to train in hospitals, to test knowledge of aggressive pain management therapies, to develop a Medicare billing code for hospital-based care, and to develop new standards for assessing and treating pain at the end of life.

  Annas says lawyers can play a key role in insisting that these well-meaning medical initiatives translate into better care. "Large numbers of physicians seem unconcerned with the pain their patients are needlessly and predictably suffering," to the extent that it constitutes "systematic patient abuse." He says medical licensing boards "must make it clear...that painful deaths are presumptively ones that are incompetently managed and should result in license suspension."

56. From the first three paragraphs, we learn that .
[A] doctors used to increase drug dosages to control their patients' pain.
[B] it is still illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.
[C] the Supreme Court strongly opposes physician-assisted suicide.
[D] patients have no constitutional right to commit suicide.

[答案] B

[解题思路]

  A选项对应于文章第三段的第一句话"Doctors have used that principle in recent years to justify using high doses of morphine to control terminally ill patients' pain"(近年来,医生们一直在用这项原则,为自己替病危患者注射大剂量的吗啡镇痛的做法提供正当的理由),但是显然选项与原文不符,用大剂量并不表示医生们总是会增加剂量。C选项对应于文章第二段第一句话"Although it ruled that there is no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide, the Court in effect supported the medical principle of "double effect""(尽管裁决认为,宪法没有赋予医生帮助病人自杀的权利,然而最高法庭实际上却认可了医疗界的"双重效应"原则),这说明最高法院的态度至少不是强烈反对。D选项的对应信息同C选项,但是原文的意思是"宪法没有赋予医生帮助病人自杀的权利",没有提到"宪法没有赋予病人自杀的权力",因而也是错误选项。同样,也很容易判断B是正确选项。

[题目译文]

从前三段,我们了解到
[A] 医生过去通过增加剂量来减轻病人的痛苦
[B] 医生帮助那些垂死的病人结束生病现在仍然是非法的
[C] 最高法院强烈反对医生协助病人自杀
[D] 病人没有宪法赋予的自杀权力

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 下一页
  相关推荐:新东方:09考研英语翻译常考和必考词汇集锦
       考研英语阅读理解命题思路透析和真题揭秘
       2009年考研英语历年真题阅读理解精读笔记汇总
文章搜索
任汝芬老师
在线名师:任汝芬老师
   著名政治教育专家;研究生、博士生导师;中国国家人事人才培...[详细]
考研栏目导航
版权声明:如果考研网所转载内容不慎侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系800@exam8.com,我们将会及时处理。如转载本考研网内容,请注明出处。