首页 - 网校 - 万题库 - 美好明天 - 直播 - 导航
您现在的位置: 考试吧 > 自学考试 > 复习指导 > 英语(二) > 正文

2018年10月自考英语(二)阅读强化辅导(4)

来源:考试吧 2018-5-3 9:00:00 要考试,上考试吧! 自考万题库
考试吧整理“2018年10月自考英语(二)阅读强化辅导(4)”,更多2018年自考复习指导,请及时关注考试吧自考网或微信搜索公众号“万题库自考”获取!

扫描/长按下面二维码
获取自考备考指导

扫描/长按下面二维码
免费做题、免费学直播课

  点击查看:2018年10月自考英语(二)阅读强化辅导汇总

  Advantage Unfair

  According to the writer Walter Ellis, author of a book called the Oxbridge Conspiracy, Britain is still dominated by the old-boy network: it isn't what you know that matters, but who you know. He claims that at Oxford and Cambridge Universities (Oxbridge for short) a few select people start on an escalator ride which, over the years, carries them to the tops of British privilege and power. His research revealed that the top professions all continue to be dominated, if not 90 per cent, then 60 or 65 per cent, by Oxbridge graduates.

  And yet ,says Ellis, Oxbridge graduates make up only two per cent of the total number of students who graduate from Britain's universities. Other researches also seem to support his belief that Oxbridge graduates start with an unfair advantage in the employment market. In the law, a recently published report showed that out of 26 senior judges appointed to the High Court last year, all of them went to private schools and 21 of them went to Oxbridge.

  But can this be said to amount to a conspiracy? Not according to Dr. John Rae, a former headmaster of one of Britain's leading private schools, Westminster:"I would accept that there was a bias in some key areas of British life, but that bias has now gone. Some time ago - in the 60s and before - entry to Oxford and Cambridge was not entirely on merit. Now, there's absolutely no question in any objective observer's mind that entry to Oxford and Cambridge is fiercely competitive."However, many would disagree with this. For, although over three-quarters of British pupils are educated in state schools, over half the students that go to Oxbridge have been to private, or "public" schools. Is this because pupils from Britain's private schools are more intelligent than those from state schools, or are they simply better prepared?

  On average, about £5,000 a year is spent on each private school pupil, more than twice the amount spent on state school pupils. So how can the state schools be expected to compete with the private schools when they have far fewer resources? And how can they prepare their pupils for the special entrance exam to Oxford University, which requires extra preparation, and for which many public school pupils traditionally stay at school and do an additional term?

  Until recently, many blamed Oxford for this bias because of the university's special entrance exam (Cambridge abolished its entrance exam in 1986). But last February, Oxford University decided to abolish the exam to encourage more state school applicants. From autumn 1996, Oxford University applicants, like applicants to other universities, will be judged only on their A level results and on their performance at interviews, although some departments might still set special tests.

  However, some argue that there's nothing wrong in having elite places of learning, and that by their very nature, these places should not be easily accessible. Most countries are run by an elite and have centres of academic excellence from which the elite are recruited.

  Walter Ellis accepts that this is true:"But in France, for example, there are something like 40 equivalents of university, which provide this elite through a much broader base. In America you've got the Ivy League, centred on Harvard and Yale, with Princeton and Stanford and others. But again, those universities together - the elite universities - are about ten or fifteen in number, and are being pushed along from behind by other great universities like, for example, Chicago and Berkeley. So you don't have just this narrow concentration of two universities providing a constantly replicating elite."

  When it comes to Oxford and Cambridge being elitist because of the number of private school pupils they accept, Professor Stone of Oxford University argues that there is a simple fact he and his associates cannot ignore:"If certain schools do better than others then we just have to accept it. We cannot be a place for remedial education. It's not what Oxford is there to do."

  However, since academic excellence does appear to be related to the amount of money spent per pupil. This does seem to imply that Prime Minister John Major's vision of Britain as a classless society is still a long way off. And it may be worth remembering that while John Major didn't himself go to Oxbridge, most of his ministers did.

扫描/长按二维码即可帮助自考通关
获取2018自考报名时间
获取最后6套预测卷
免费获取8次直播课程
获取历年考试真题试卷

自考万题库下载微信搜索"万题库自考"

 

1 2 3 下一页

  相关推荐:

  2018年自学考试《英语(二)》阅读理解综合辅导汇总

  2018年自学考试《英语(二)》大纲词汇表汇总

  自考手机题库上线 名师视频解析 立即下载体验!

  关注万题库自考微信 第一时间获取2018年自考报名!

文章搜索
万题库小程序
万题库小程序
·章节视频 ·章节练习
·免费真题 ·模考试题
微信扫码,立即获取!
扫码免费使用
大学语文
共计461课时
讲义已上传
18020人在学
管理系统中计算机应用
共计21课时
讲义已上传
7218人在学
政治经济学(财经类)
共计738课时
讲义已上传
87485人在学
经济法概论(财经类)
共计21课时
讲义已上传
989人在学
毛概
共计269课时
讲义已上传
16493人在学
推荐使用万题库APP学习
扫一扫,下载万题库
手机学习,复习效率提升50%!
版权声明:如果自学考试网所转载内容不慎侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系800@exam8.com,我们将会及时处理。如转载本自学考试网内容,请注明出处。
官方
微信
扫描关注自考微信
领《大数据宝典》
报名
查分
扫描二维码
关注自考报名查分
看直播 下载
APP
下载万题库
领精选6套卷
万题库
微信小程序
帮助
中心
文章责编:zhaorong