首页 - 网校 - 万题库 - 美好明天 - 直播 - 导航
热点搜索
学员登录 | 用户名
密码
新学员
老学员
您现在的位置: 考试吧 > 考研 > 考研答案 > 正文

2018年考研《英语一》完形填空源文

来源:考试吧 2017-12-23 16:39:49 要考试,上考试吧! 考研万题库
“2018年考研《英语一》完形填空源文”由考试吧考后发布,更多2018考研答案、2018考研真题等信息,请关注考试吧考研网或搜索公众微信号“万题库考研”!

2018考研真题及答案热点文章微信对答案万题库估分

扫描/长按下面二维码
获取考研真题及答案

扫描/长按下面二维码
下载考研万题库估分

  >>>2018年考研《英语》真题及答案解析汇总

  Can we trust Trust?

  Od Fremantle Philosophy Café

  Trust is a tricky business. On the one hand, it’s a prerequisite for many worthwhile things: child care, relationships, friendships—even just eating at a restaurant. On the other hand, putting your faith in the wrong place often carries a high price.

  Many philosophers define trust as a kind of reliance on other people based on a certain attitude.

  What is the attitude that underpins trust?

  Philosophers have answered that question many ways. For example, some say it is a simple belief that the other person will do the right thing for the right reasons. Others say it is rooted in a felt altruism, or in the hope that displaying trust will influence the other person to do what one wants them to do.

  The problem with the belief view, according to Baier, was two-fold: first, it failed to distinguish trust from mere reliance, and secondly (and perhaps more importantly), it failed to make sense of the idea that when you trust someone and your trust is violated, you feel a sense of betrayal rather than mere disappointment.

  Trust is important, but it is also dangerous. It is important because it allows us to form relationships with people and to depend on them—for love, for advice, for help with our plumbing, or what have you—especially when we know that no outside force compels them to give us such things.

  But trust also involves the risk that people we trust will not pull through for us; for, if there were some guarantee that they would pull through, then we would have no need to trust them.

  Thus, trust is also dangerous. What we risk while trusting is the loss of the things that we entrust to others, including our self-respect, perhaps, which can be shattered by the betrayal of our trust.

  Trust is one pattern of reliance, where the trusting person, or trustor can’t control what the trusted person, or trustee, does, and may not even know what the trustee does at the time he does it, but plans on the trustee doing one thing rather than another.

  This pattern of reliance is no doubt essential to social life and basic survival.

  But is it rational? Does trust really amount to being stupid, or helpless, or both?

  ” If you need a guarantee, you’re not trusting. To trust someone to do something, is to rely on them to do that thing, without having any guarantees.

  Even so, we often have no choice but to trust. We’re forced to count on others all the time.

  “Trust” is just what we call this kind of helpless dependence on others. We have got no way to make sure anyone will actually do what we count on them to do.

  So we say I “trust” them. But perhaps I'm missing something.

  Trust isn’t expectation with no guarantee. It’s expectation with a certain sort of guarantee. The sort of guarantee one gets with a promise, for example. The trustor relies on the trustee to be trustworthy. To live up to their word.

  Here are some ponderings:)

  if we take the assumption that trust is a kind of reliance: to trust someone is to rely on them in a certain kind of way.

  The question that philosophers ask is:

  What is the type of reliance that constitutes trust?

  So, let’s think about trust as follows: to trust someone to do something is to rely on them to do it and to do so out of a certain attitude towards the proposition that they will do it for the right reasons.

  If you think of that as the basic nature of trust, the philosophical questions are two:

  What is the right attitude?

  What are the right reasons?

  And you can think of philosophical disputes about the nature of trust as disputes along one of those two dimensions.

  But can’t we trust someone we don’t believe is trustworthy? Have you trusted trusted others to behave responsibly; believing that they really would?

  Trusting those who are not trustworthy, however, seems a risk we often have to take.

  Trusting where we cannot verify also is a risk we often have to take.

  What do you think of this statement?

  Trust is Good; Control is Better

  Vladimir Ilych Lenin

  Seligman, Adam B. (1998). "On the limits of Confidence and Role Expectations". American Journal of Economics and Sociology.

  Ready to Trust in the Pondering?

扫描/长按二维码关注可获取考研答案
获取2018考研真题答案
获取2018考研分数线
获取2018考研调剂信息

考研万题库下载微信搜索"万题库考研"

  相关推荐

  2018年考研答案2018年考研真题考研万题库估分

  2018考研政治答案考研英语答案2018考研数学答案

  直播解析:2018考研真题答案解析关注考研微信对答案热点文章

  2018考研成绩查询时间微信查分提醒考研复试分数线

文章搜索
万题库小程序
万题库小程序
·章节视频 ·章节练习
·免费真题 ·模考试题
微信扫码,立即获取!
扫码免费使用
考研英语一
共计364课时
讲义已上传
53214人在学
考研英语二
共计30课时
讲义已上传
5495人在学
考研数学一
共计71课时
讲义已上传
5100人在学
考研数学二
共计46课时
讲义已上传
3684人在学
考研数学三
共计41课时
讲义已上传
4483人在学
推荐使用万题库APP学习
扫一扫,下载万题库
手机学习,复习效率提升50%!
版权声明:如果考研网所转载内容不慎侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系800@exam8.com,我们将会及时处理。如转载本考研网内容,请注明出处。
官方
微信
扫描关注考研微信
领《大数据宝典》
下载
APP
下载万题库
领精选6套卷
万题库
微信小程序
帮助
中心
文章责编:wangmeng